University of Ottawa PrivacyInfo
BNA Internet Law News
  introduction     phase I
    home  
 
  phase I
    overview 
 
  phase I
   country specific 
 
  phase II
     survey  
 
  contact     log in     log out  
 

ccTLD Governance Project RSS
News Feed



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
argentina
armenia
australia
austria
belgium
canada
china
christmas island
colombia
czech republic
denmark
elsalvador
finland
france
gambia
germany
ghana
guatemala
hong kong
india
indonesia
ireland
israel
italy
japan
korea
liechtenstein
libia
malaysia
malawi
mauritiana
mexico
morocco
netherlands
new zealand
norway
peru
poland
russia
south africa
spain
sweden
switzerland
taiwan
tunisia
tuvalu
ukraine
united aram emirates
united kingdom
united states


If you manage a ccTLD, we would like to invite you to participate in the next phase of the project, which seeks to better understand the relationship between governments and ccTLDs. Your participation consists of answering a questionnaire, developed in cooperation with the ITU. The questionnaire can be found here in English, French and Spanish.

Please return the questionnaire via email or to the postal address or fax number (Att: Michael Geist) found here.

This project reviews the relationship between country code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs) and governments in 45 countries. Included are 1) tables which highlight the main relationships, and 2) country-specific information. The preliminary findings include:


  • Ten ccTLDsare government agencies or departments. In these cases the relationship is typically formalized between government and agency.
  • Nine ccTLDs are private, for-profit enterprises. Of these two (United States, Japan) have a established a contractual relationship with the government, three have established an informal relationship, and four have no relationship with the government.
  • 20 ccTLDsare non-profit organizations. Four have formal, contractual relationships with their governments along with an ICANN agreement that governs their relationship. Five do not have a government relationship. Ten ccTLDs have informal relations with their government, of these, at least 3 are awaiting formalization of their relationship in the near future (Russia, South Africa, Italy).
  • One ccTLDis managed by an individual. It is battling government attempts to take over the ccTLD management.
  • Five ccTLDs are academic institutions; of these two have no relationship with their government. Two ccTLDs (Guatemala, Colombia) have battled takeover attempts by their government.
The following tables provide an overview of the ccTLD-government relationships:

Table 1: countries where the ccTLD is part of the government
Table 2: countries where the ccTLD is private sector
Table 3: countries where the ccTLD is a non-profit corporation
Table 4: countries where the ccTLD is academic


to top || to home


Methodology


The government-ccTLD relationships have been categorized in the following manner:

Formal:
  1. Where ccTLD is part of government, or
  2. Where there is an official agreement or contract between the ccTLD and government.
Informal:
  1. Where ccTLD has a working relationship with government, or
  2. Where the ccTLD is sanctioned by government, without an official agreement, but with some contact.
None:
  1. Where there is no relationship with the government, or
  2. the ccTLD operates with government sanction, but no contact.

Data for this project was obtained from ccTLD websites, ccTLD contacts and GAC representatives between June and September 2002. The following questions were posed:

  • What type of relationship exists between the ccTLD and the government?
  • Has legislation been enacted on ccTL